<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robotic Vacum Cleaners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/</link>
	<description>Floorvac robotic vacuum, scooba review, robo vacuum, roomba</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Alderson Warm-Fork]]></title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alderson Warm-Fork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>both of a positive tendency to understand things by analogy with ourselves, and also of &quot;lack of physical explanation&quot;. 

Re. the Turing test, I don&#039;t think this is a big issue, but I would say that there is a kind of movement there in the changing patterns of words on the screen - there&#039;s changes, and we ask ourselves &#039;what&#039;s producing those changes&#039;? 

So I guess what I&#039;m now thinking is that there&#039;s a sort of &#039;competition&#039; for the explanation of any given change/movement/event/behaviour by either a law-like &#039;physical&#039; explanation, or an analogy-with-myself &#039;conscious&#039; explanation. What about when neither is possible? I&#039;m not sure - maybe the idea of the &#039;beyond&#039;, the &#039;mysterious&#039;, is in some sense an intermediate concept between physical and mental? I do think though, this still leaves the same basic problem that I described: both forms of explanation are potentially very flexible - we can formulate and adopt the general principle that even things we cannot concretely explain in physical terms work in physical ways that we don&#039;t ye understand, and correspondingly we can suppose that even behaviours we don&#039;t understand (i.e. that make no sense) are still in fact the results of consciousness. Given that, their respective spheres seem potentially ill-defined - hence, the &#039;problem of consciousness&#039; in modern philosophy. 

&quot;Though the ancients had much to say about mental matters, it is less clear whether they had any specific concepts or concerns for what we now think of as consciousness.&quot;

This makes sense to me. Prior to Descartes, there wasn&#039;t this big idea that the physical and the mental are alien to each other, that water and rocks are to be explained in terms stripped of any suggestion of consciousness - one ancient philosopher (Heraclitus?) described atoms as being moved around by their mutual &#039;loves&#039; and &#039;hates&#039;. 

I&#039;m afraid I still don&#039;t feel you&#039;ve defined consciousness - for one thing, the two things you mention look different to me. I think a mongoose (or me when I&#039;m half-asleep?) has a first-person view on the world, and &#039;phenomenal consciousness&#039;, but hardly any self-awareness.]]&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both of a positive tendency to understand things by analogy with ourselves, and also of &#8220;lack of physical explanation&#8221;. </p>
<p>Re. the Turing test, I don&#039;t think this is a big issue, but I would say that there is a kind of movement there in the changing patterns of words on the screen &#8211; there&#039;s changes, and we ask ourselves &#039;what&#039;s producing those changes&#039;? </p>
<p>So I guess what I&#039;m now thinking is that there&#039;s a sort of &#039;competition&#039; for the explanation of any given change/movement/event/behaviour by either a law-like &#039;physical&#039; explanation, or an analogy-with-myself &#039;conscious&#039; explanation. What about when neither is possible? I&#039;m not sure &#8211; maybe the idea of the &#039;beyond&#039;, the &#039;mysterious&#039;, is in some sense an intermediate concept between physical and mental? I do think though, this still leaves the same basic problem that I described: both forms of explanation are potentially very flexible &#8211; we can formulate and adopt the general principle that even things we cannot concretely explain in physical terms work in physical ways that we don&#039;t ye understand, and correspondingly we can suppose that even behaviours we don&#039;t understand (i.e. that make no sense) are still in fact the results of consciousness. Given that, their respective spheres seem potentially ill-defined &#8211; hence, the &#039;problem of consciousness&#039; in modern philosophy. </p>
<p>&#8220;Though the ancients had much to say about mental matters, it is less clear whether they had any specific concepts or concerns for what we now think of as consciousness.&#8221;</p>
<p>This makes sense to me. Prior to Descartes, there wasn&#039;t this big idea that the physical and the mental are alien to each other, that water and rocks are to be explained in terms stripped of any suggestion of consciousness &#8211; one ancient philosopher (Heraclitus?) described atoms as being moved around by their mutual &#039;loves&#039; and &#039;hates&#039;. </p>
<p>I&#039;m afraid I still don&#039;t feel you&#039;ve defined consciousness &#8211; for one thing, the two things you mention look different to me. I think a mongoose (or me when I&#039;m half-asleep?) has a first-person view on the world, and &#039;phenomenal consciousness&#039;, but hardly any self-awareness.]]></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soulcast: All New Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-2032</link>
		<dc:creator>Soulcast: All New Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-2032</guid>
		<description>Buying tips and advice on purchasing the correct robot vacuum to suit your life style and needs Do you always find yourself spending your precious time just to sweep the daily dose of dust from your living room What if you hire someone to do it How much will it cost you not to mention you have to pay these guys on a daily basis Then youa re in for a surprise A robotic vacuum cleaner may be the only solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying tips and advice on purchasing the correct robot vacuum to suit your life style and needs Do you always find yourself spending your precious time just to sweep the daily dose of dust from your living room What if you hire someone to do it How much will it cost you not to mention you have to pay these guys on a daily basis Then youa re in for a surprise A robotic vacuum cleaner may be the only solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>yes mianh i have seen these vacum cleaners around they are every where and do u know my room needs a hoover if you want to look its ok you ca if you want to no presure i rrally dont mind ok well guess who it is ill give you a clue  MIAHN well if you dont know who it is by now here is another clue GIVE ME MY TEXT BOOKS BACK I DIDNT SAY YOU COULD USE THEM if you reallly dont know now you have a problem ok then cya miahn i mean mianh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes mianh i have seen these vacum cleaners around they are every where and do u know my room needs a hoover if you want to look its ok you ca if you want to no presure i rrally dont mind ok well guess who it is ill give you a clue  MIAHN well if you dont know who it is by now here is another clue GIVE ME MY TEXT BOOKS BACK I DIDNT SAY YOU COULD USE THEM if you reallly dont know now you have a problem ok then cya miahn i mean mianh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helicrompter</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Helicrompter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>Got to say Dwayne love your comments.  However, I am stumped or flummoxed with a capital F at who you is.  I can usually decipher a Terror through their cryptic tag but...but I draw blanks here.  On you.  I was thinking okay D.H.  That could stand for Designated Hitter (like if the Fab Ts&#039; first incarnation was a baseball team and you were the guy/girl who would always hit it out of the park...but no).  Maybe it could stand for Dustin Hooper.  But why?  Or is it Dainty Harry?  But I haven&#039;t seen that guy since the Kelowna fire.  Vacum cleaners?  Are you my familys old cleaning lady?  But she didn&#039;t use a Hoover, she used a broom and mop and General Electric.  Donk Hizzle?  Deep Heat? Dimples Hernia?  Doctor HIVago?

Must say DH, i am stumped.

Any hints?

Rick Tee

Can you give me some clues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to say Dwayne love your comments.  However, I am stumped or flummoxed with a capital F at who you is.  I can usually decipher a Terror through their cryptic tag but&#8230;but I draw blanks here.  On you.  I was thinking okay D.H.  That could stand for Designated Hitter (like if the Fab Ts&#039; first incarnation was a baseball team and you were the guy/girl who would always hit it out of the park&#8230;but no).  Maybe it could stand for Dustin Hooper.  But why?  Or is it Dainty Harry?  But I haven&#039;t seen that guy since the Kelowna fire.  Vacum cleaners?  Are you my familys old cleaning lady?  But she didn&#039;t use a Hoover, she used a broom and mop and General Electric.  Donk Hizzle?  Deep Heat? Dimples Hernia?  Doctor HIVago?</p>
<p>Must say DH, i am stumped.</p>
<p>Any hints?</p>
<p>Rick Tee</p>
<p>Can you give me some clues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pippy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>pippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve studied AI. The fundamentals have not changed for a long time, and much of the theory originated from the 60&#039;s. I can understand why you&#039;d be angry at my statement, but unfortunately academia can&#039;t even sort the basics of intelligent logic out. Knowledge representation is an issue that hasn&#039;t entered the (metaphysical portion of scientific That&#039;s how primitive humans are when it comes to automated intelligent problem solving, and it&#039;s why we still have vacum cleaners that run into walls. Cars that drive themselves is high-tech, but when you really think about it all the road rules are already highly automized, and they only bottle neck we really had was the computing power for real time collision detection and world orientation. There have been many papers about cars driving themselves for the past 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve studied AI. The fundamentals have not changed for a long time, and much of the theory originated from the 60&#8242;s. I can understand why you&#8217;d be angry at my statement, but unfortunately academia can&#8217;t even sort the basics of intelligent logic out. Knowledge representation is an issue that hasn&#8217;t entered the (metaphysical portion of scientific That&#8217;s how primitive humans are when it comes to automated intelligent problem solving, and it&#8217;s why we still have vacum cleaners that run into walls. Cars that drive themselves is high-tech, but when you really think about it all the road rules are already highly automized, and they only bottle neck we really had was the computing power for real time collision detection and world orientation. There have been many papers about cars driving themselves for the past 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechNewsWire</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>TechNewsWire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>Asus bring out new robotic vacuum cleaner - &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asus bring out new robotic vacuum cleaner &#8211; <a rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superflat44</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>superflat44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Man, those robotic vacuum cleaners are going to be really efficient in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, those robotic vacuum cleaners are going to be really efficient in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendellmartin82</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>wendellmartin82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>#ThingsThatPissMeOff homework, vacum cleaners, asians, ugly feet, butterflies, lazy eyes and hoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#ThingsThatPissMeOff homework, vacum cleaners, asians, ugly feet, butterflies, lazy eyes and hoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SararSprayberry</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>SararSprayberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>Robotic Pool Cleaners Baracuda Pool Cleaners Vacuum Out The Gunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robotic Pool Cleaners Baracuda Pool Cleaners Vacuum Out The Gunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarrriaRose</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>MarrriaRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visticje.com/buzzwordbob.com/robotic-vacum-cleaners/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>my aunt trippin me out Talkin Bout these Thousand Dolla&apos; Vacum Cleaners. Take Ya Tired ass Home!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my aunt trippin me out Talkin Bout these Thousand Dolla&apos; Vacum Cleaners. Take Ya Tired ass Home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.buzzwordbob.com @ 2012-02-07 17:36:14 -->
